|
Author
|
Topic: Recipe # Symbol
|
Ira Member Posts: 1043 From:Portland, Oregon Registered: Jun 99
|
posted December 09, 2008 12:12 AM
What does the Symbol "#" mean to you when you see it in a recipe?I've always known that symbol to refer to the imperial pound (lb), as have my co-workers. Then today we had a culinary school student trying out for a position and he said that they strongly enforce that "#" in a recipe refers to "each". The subject came up when he put in 2.5 mushrooms into a beef carbonade dish for 30 people (rather than the 2.5 pounds that was meant to be there). That was easily fixed though, and he got the job too :-) IP: Logged |
jefegarme Member Posts: 275 From:Tucumcari,NM Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted December 09, 2008 01:07 PM
Well it is called the pound sign when you are on automatic phone call you are ask to enter your number then push the pound sign. So I would imagine it is the same in recipes. When did they stop putting LB and adding the # sign? any way?IP: Logged |
Bryguy Member Posts: 254 From:Wasaga Beach, Ontario, Canada Registered: May 2003
|
posted December 09, 2008 08:02 PM
Hi Ira I have never seen it used in a recipe before. If I was seeing it I would assume that it meant lb. Hope this helps God Bless BrianIP: Logged |
ChefSteve Member Posts: 75 From:Diamond Springs, Calif. Registered: May 2003
|
posted December 09, 2008 09:20 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ira: What does the Symbol "#" mean to you when you see it in a recipe?
I can mean either "pound" or "number." It just depends on the context. It generally means "number" when it comes before the number -- Diamond and Caldor #4 locomotive is the same as Diamond and Caldor No. 4. It usually means "pound" when it comes after the number -- 4# is the same as 4 lb. or 4 pounds. While I do use the pound symbol when writing notes and making a shopping list, I avoid its use in published recipes on my blog or in Master Cook, etc. I rarely see it used in recipes on the Internet of in cookbooks. IP: Logged |
Ira Member Posts: 1043 From:Portland, Oregon Registered: Jun 99
|
posted December 10, 2008 02:04 AM
Thank you - all good points.It's only that way for our internal recipe database, not for anything available to the public or published in any way. I'm wondering too if they teach #3 vs 3# as Steve mentioned. You're right, if something was #3 I would think of it as a number too. Mind sharing your blog link Steve? I'd love to check out your recipes there! IP: Logged |
tyronebcookin Member Posts: 134 From:Alabama (but travel out of country most of the year) Registered: Jun 2004
|
posted December 10, 2008 10:33 AM
Yeah, I get around a bit and I would have to agree with Chef Steve...And don't forget those #10 Cans!!! IP: Logged |
ChefSteve Member Posts: 75 From:Diamond Springs, Calif. Registered: May 2003
|
posted December 10, 2008 11:41 AM
quote: Originally posted by Ira: Mind sharing your blog link Steve? I'd love to check out your recipes there!
Thanks, Ira and Tyrone ... I forgot about #10 cans ... Here you go: 'Round the Chuckbox [This message has been edited by ChefSteve (edited December 10, 2008).] IP: Logged |
Leo Member Posts: 1373 From:Rocky Mount, North Carolina, USA Registered: May 2003
|
posted January 11, 2009 03:17 PM
Y'all got it...the ol' # 10's 303's etc....and they do teach that but indicating a size or description not an amount....I use them alot in what I do and prefer LB as I am writing recipes where #10 and 10# may be in the same line...------------------ Hungry for Him, Leo Griego Member Support 2 Cor 4:7 IP: Logged |